/ Paper arXiv 2611.00074
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Key numbers
From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Face image quality assessment (FIQA) estimates the utility of a face image for automated face recognition and has been proposed as a morphing attack detection (MAD) signal that requires no morph-specific training. We evaluate 17 FIQA methods from all current FIQA categories on 20 morphing attack sets from two datasets, FRLL and FEI, including five diffusion-based attack sets. Each quality score is used directly as a MAD decision score. Unlike prior work, which inverted a quality measure when this lowered its error, we fix the score direction of each method in advance from its definition, so that cases in which morphs receive higher quality than bona fide samples remain visible. On FRLL, DifFIQA(R) achieves a mean D-EER of 11.42%, and together with CLIB-FIQA and eDifFIQA(L) clearly outperforms all other FIQA methods. A strong separation of bona fide and morph scores does not imply good detection performance: on the diffusion-based attacks, up to 11 of 17 methods assign higher quality to morphs than to bona fide samples, and the largest reversed separation in the study coincides with the worst detection result of the study. Performance also depends strongly on the attack: GraFIQs(L), the best detector of DCMorph and Arc2Morph on FRLL, performs poorly on the landmark-based and GAN-based attacks. On FEI, the lowest mean D-EER is 39.75%, and a threshold set on the bona fide data of one dataset does not transfer to the other.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.