All papersGenerative AI & Diffusion

Location Matters: Sparse Latent-Variance Attacks for Face Privacy against Diffusion Personalization

/ Paper arXiv 2611.14254

Key numbers

5%a sparse adversarial protection framework that modifies only 5% of the spatial locations in a facial…

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Why this ranked

MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works

8 / 100#68 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.

Builder evidence8 / 40

  • Code released

Community attention0 / 30

  • ▲ 0 upvotes on Hugging Face

Author track record0 / 15

  • Nothing found

What the paper shows0 / 15

  • Nothing found

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Text-to-image diffusion models can learn and reproduce an individual's identity from only a few reference photos, creating risks of unauthorized and misleading content generation. Proactive defenses address this risk by adding adversarial perturbations to facial images before release, thereby disrupting identity acquisition during downstream personalization. However, existing methods typically rely on dense L_\infty-bounded perturbations, whose accumulated distortions can become visible around facial structures. Recent methods improve protected-image quality, but often at the cost of reduced protection effectiveness. In this paper, we propose Sparse Encoder Attack on Latent Variance (SEAL), a sparse adversarial protection framework that modifies only 5% of the spatial locations in a facial image. SEAL combines a differentiable top-k masking scheme that jointly optimizes perturbation locations and values with a variance-oriented objective over the frozen VAE encoder's latent distribution to disrupt identity-consistent representations. A saliency-guided dispersion penalty further discourages perturbation concentration in perceptually salient facial regions. Experiments on CelebA-HQ and VGGFace2 show that SEAL achieves the best protected-image quality among the compared methods, exceeding 41 dB PSNR with 0.97 SSIM and at most 0.07 LPIPS, while reducing identity similarity to at most 0.15 after diffusion personalization. These results demonstrate that sparse location optimization enables strong identity protection while preserving high visual quality. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Lvxan/SEAL

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Try it

Code, models and demos that use this paper.

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF