All papersOther MLHugging Face

AeroZoo: A Benchmark of Well-Posed Flow Problems for Foundation Models of Aerodynamics

/ Paper arXiv 2611.17152

Key numbers

12%doubling the training cases cuts it by about 12% up to 400 cases
76.9% → 8.4%boundary-condition tokens cut GeoTransolver's median velocity error from 76.9% to 8.4% of the inlet speed in…
11.0%uniform inlet flow: 11.0%

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Why this ranked

MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works

5 / 100#160 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.

Builder evidence0 / 40

  • No public code found

Community attention0 / 30

  • ▲ 0 upvotes on Hugging Face

Author track record5 / 15

  • From Hugging Face (a known lab)

What the paper shows0 / 15

  • Nothing found

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Neural surrogates for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are trained and ranked on datasets that each vary one design family in one flow domain. Such datasets cannot test the least that an aerodynamic foundation model must do: predict CFD-quality incompressible flow in seconds for new shapes in new enclosures. On DrivAerML, larger models and longer training barely lower Transolver's error; doubling the training cases cuts it by about 12% up to 400 cases, exhausting the dataset. We introduce AeroZoo, a benchmark and training corpus of 3,815 time-mean solutions to the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) equations with a transition model, across seven geometry families, eight enclosure configurations and Reynolds numbers from 10^3 to 10^8. Each sample poses a well-posed PDE problem in the form a solver receives it: the boundary meshes grouped by condition type, the prescribed values and the fluid properties. The 2,816 samples with a stable time mean form the canonical benchmark: two tasks, engineering metrics and 22 frozen splits, disjoint in geometry, that hold out geometry families, enclosures, boundary-condition layouts and Reynolds ranges. On the random split, boundary-condition tokens cut GeoTransolver's median velocity error from 76.9% to 8.4% of the inlet speed in single-seed runs (uniform inlet flow: 11.0%). ISLA, a transformer for boundary-driven PDEs, reaches 5.3% over four seeds, about 4 times the change from a finer mesh. On the same test samples, a held-out geometry family barely changes ISLA's error relative to uniform flow, and a held-out enclosure or boundary-condition layout raises it 2.4 to 9.2 times. The data and the scoring code will be released.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF