All papersLLMs & Language ModelsCarnegie Mellon

EgoX: Egocentric Cross-Embodiment Manipulation with Embodiment Dreaming

/ Paper arXiv 2611.16728

Key numbers

13Across 13 task-embodiment pairs spanning five tasks and six robot embodiments

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Why this ranked

MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works

16 / 100#26 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.

Builder evidence8 / 40

  • Code released

Community attention3 / 30

  • ▲ 1 upvotes on Hugging Face

Author track record5 / 15

  • From Carnegie Mellon (a known lab)

What the paper shows0 / 15

  • Nothing found

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Generalist manipulation policies can benefit from the complementary experience of humans, real robots, and simulated agents. However, differences in morphology, sensing, and control interfaces make it difficult to learn effectively from their combined demonstrations. We introduce EgoX, an egocentric cross-embodiment learning framework that organizes heterogeneous demonstrations through semantically corresponding observation and action modalities. EgoX pretrains a Modularized Cross-Embodiment Transformer with Embodiment Dreaming (MXT+) on this mixture and fine-tunes it on target-embodiment demonstrations. Within each embodiment, MXT+ assigns a dedicated tokenizer to each observation modality and a dedicated expert to each action modality, with a Transformer trunk shared across embodiments. A training-only embodiment-dreaming objective predicts latent representations of future visual and proprioceptive states, encouraging the shared trunk to model each embodiment's dynamics. Across 13 task-embodiment pairs spanning five tasks and six robot embodiments, including five physical robots and one simulated humanoid, cross-embodiment pretraining raises MXT+'s average normalized task progress from 0.63 to 0.80 over training from scratch. The gains are particularly pronounced under out-of-distribution conditions, where average task progress increases from 0.53 to 0.77. Ablations demonstrate the benefits of broader pretraining mixtures, modular interfaces, and embodiment dreaming, with dreaming producing more similar latent geometry across embodiments. Project page: egox-dream.github.io.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF