All papersLLMs & Language Models

Few-Shot Cross-Subject Neural--Image Retrieval via Stimulus-Anchored Latent Bias Calibration

/ Paper arXiv 2611.16257

Key numbers

16…configuration from 0.1867 without calibration to 0.2013 and 0.2336 with M=2 and M=16 stimulus-level calibration samples

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Why this ranked

MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works

8 / 100#111 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.

Builder evidence8 / 40

  • Code released

Community attention0 / 30

  • ▲ 0 upvotes on Hugging Face

Author track record0 / 15

  • Nothing found

What the paper shows0 / 15

  • Nothing found

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

In cross-subject neural--image retrieval, comparing the mean of a few stimulus-matched target observations with the global source mean conflates subject-specific representation shifts with stimulus-composition effects. To address this problem, we propose Stimulus-Anchored Latent Bias Calibration (SA-LBC), which estimates the first-order shift under fixed preprocessing and a frozen source-trained representation by averaging residuals between target responses and same-stimulus source-population anchors, then shrinks the correction using source-derived uncertainty. Under uniform sampling without replacement from a finite stimulus population, we derive exact finite-population MSE expressions for the unshrunk anchored and global-mean estimators, including residual--anchor cross-covariance, and establish a necessary and sufficient condition for anchoring to reduce MSE relative to global-mean estimation. In a 10-subject leave-one-subject-out evaluation on THINGS-EEG2, SA-LBC increases mean reciprocal rank (MRR) for the Attention--CLIP ViT-B/32 configuration from 0.1867 without calibration to 0.2013 and 0.2336 with M=2 and M=16 stimulus-level calibration samples, respectively. Across six neural--visual configurations and all calibration budgets, stimulus-matched anchors yield higher MRR than anchors with shuffled stimulus identities, but retrieval gains over no calibration remain representation-dependent. At (M=2), shrinkage improves MRR over the unshrunk anchored estimator in all six configurations, but its effects at larger budgets vary across representations; the relative ranking of translation and orientation corrections also depends on regularization strength. Thus, lower shift-estimation MSE does not guarantee higher retrieval performance. The source code is publicly available at: https://github.com/Xizhang-Yao/SA-LBC.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Try it

Code, models and demos that use this paper.

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF