All papersLLMs & Language ModelsHugging Face

Robo-SWE: An Executable Issue-Resolution Dataset Mined from Robot Software Repositories

/ Paper arXiv 2611.16116

Key numbers

45.8%resolve rates range from 45.8% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 to 56.5% for Claude Opus 5.5
56.5%resolve rates range from 45.8% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 to 56.5% for Claude Opus 5.5
54.1%GPT-6.1 Sol reaches 54.1% at maximum effort and 52.5% at medium effort

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Why this ranked

MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works

5 / 100#151 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.

Builder evidence0 / 40

  • No public code found

Community attention0 / 30

  • ▲ 0 upvotes on Hugging Face

Author track record5 / 15

  • From Hugging Face (a known lab)

What the paper shows0 / 15

  • Nothing found

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Coding agents are evaluated mostly on general-purpose software, but domain-specific systems require domain-aware evaluation. Robot software is a particularly challenging case: Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2) packages have their own build tools, simulators and learning frameworks are built on physics engines, and behavior that depends on timing and hardware is hard to test. We present Robo-SWE, a dataset of 236 executable issue-resolution tasks mined from merged pull requests in 28 public robotics repositories in four domains: ROS 2 systems, simulation and physics engines, robotics algorithm libraries, and robot-learning frameworks. Each task contains the original issue text, a container recipe for the repository at the commit before the fix, the developers' fix, and the developers' tests, which fail before the fix and pass after it in repeated offline runs. The dataset also keeps a provenance ledger of all 1,567 candidate pull requests, with the stage each reached and the reason for every rejection, and, as a first use, 3,540 graded attempts by five coding-agent setups with recorded patches and 3,529 available trajectories. Across three runs per primary setup, resolve rates range from 45.8% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 to 56.5% for Claude Opus 5.5; GPT-6.1 Sol reaches 54.1% at maximum effort and 52.5% at medium effort, and GPT-6 Astra 51.4%. GLM-5.3 resolves 46.2%, and Kimi K3.1 Pro 43.9%. The tasks are validated by execution; verification of their fairness by human reviewers is future work. The dataset and public leaderboard are available online.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF