/ Paper arXiv 2611.13994
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Key numbers
From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.
Why this ranked
MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works
5 / 100#144 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.
Builder evidence0 / 40
- No public code found
Community attention0 / 30
- ▲ 0 upvotes on Hugging Face
Author track record5 / 15
- From Hugging Face (a known lab)
What the paper shows0 / 15
- Nothing found
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Coding agents are increasingly proposed as autonomous builders of biomedical models, but existing benchmarks are small, near saturation or open to leaked information. We present BioXArena-Pro, 64 research-level modelling tasks from eight biomedical domains, each rebuilt from a published study; most hold out whole biological units such as species or cohorts. Across 22 agent configurations, the best scores 55.1 of 100, and the scaffold matters almost as much as the model. We re-ran a published method for every task: where the published recipe applies unchanged, the best agent and the methods tie; on rebuilt tasks the methods trail by 8.2 points, suggesting that agents gain by adapting to new data. Pretrained models (including biological foundation models) matter where the strongest agent uses them: forbidding them decreases its score on those tasks by 9 points. Every task was audited in several AI-assisted rounds and a final human review.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Try it
Code, models and demos that use this paper.
- Datasets:
- mbzuai-ai4bio/BioXArena-Pro-Public ↗1 dataset on Hugging Face
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.