/ Paper arXiv 2611.12884
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Why this ranked
MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works
8 / 100#84 of 955 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.
Builder evidence8 / 40
- Code released
Community attention0 / 30
- ▲ 0 upvotes on Hugging Face
Author track record0 / 15
- Nothing found
What the paper shows0 / 15
- Nothing found
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Machine learning models often achieve high average accuracy in the training data while performing poorly on test data due to subpopulation shift. A common data-centric solution is to enforce balanced subgroup proportions, but full balance can be costly, infeasible, and not always necessary. In this work, we study whether balanced training data is the unique optimal configuration for robust subpopulation generalization. We extend a Gaussian feature-model framework to theoretically characterize the performance landscape across general training subgroup distributions. We show that multiple configurations, including substantially imbalanced ones, can perform comparably to the balanced one. We further derive gradient-based directions for adjusting subgroup proportions to improve adjusted accuracy and worst-group accuracy more efficiently. These findings suggest that strategically allocating data offers a more flexible and principled path to robust performance than simple balancing. The code is available at https://github.com/zhaoyingpan/subpop-data-allocation.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Try it
Code, models and demos that use this paper.
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.