/ Paper arXiv 2611.12175
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Why this ranked
MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works
8 / 100#67 of 955 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.
Builder evidence8 / 40
- Code released
Community attention0 / 30
- ▲ 0 upvotes on Hugging Face
Author track record0 / 15
- Nothing found
What the paper shows0 / 15
- Nothing found
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Robotic manipulation has advanced rapidly in mapping visual observations and language instructions to actions. However, reliable manipulation in open-world environments requires robust spatial understanding: the ability to identify targets in complex layouts (spatial reasoning) and adapt to scenes that continuously evolve through interaction (spatial memory). Yet existing embodied benchmarks fall short in evaluating spatial understanding: they often introduce strong visual cues that bypass spatial reasoning, and focus on static scenes that offer little insight into an agent's capacity for spatial memory. To address this gap, we introduce GeoMind, a systematic benchmark for structured spatial understanding through tabletop manipulation. GeoMind comprises 54 evaluated task variants organized around spatial reasoning and spatial memory. It also incorporates a scalable pipeline that automates the generation and annotation of task instances with verified targets and executable interactions. Extensive evaluations across diverse embodied agents reveal their consistent weaknesses in spatial understanding. Our findings highlight that these agents struggle to track identities after spatial changes and convert relational or geometric constraints into executable actions. We release the GeoMind benchmark at https://github.com/Notfound-JH/GEOMIND-benchmark.git.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Try it
Code, models and demos that use this paper.
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.