/ Paper arXiv 2611.11962
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Synthetic data can scale visual pretraining, but current selection criteria only partially explain which datasets train strong representations. We propose using the energy profile of a dataset--the distribution of log-probability levels it occupies under a normalised real-image density model--as an audit and curation principle for synthetic data. To operationalise this view, we introduce Energy-Level Distribution Distance (ELD), which compares real and synthetic energy distributions. Real images span sparse high-likelihood scenes and dense low-likelihood textures, so useful synthetic data should cover this energy range rather than collapse to likely but low-variation samples. Across diverse synthetic datasets, ELD exposes mismatches missed by FID and predicts pretraining performance beyond FID, LPIPS variation, and feature-space recall, including across CNN and ViT self-supervised settings. We then use ELD to resample and mix synthetic sources, matching the real-image energy histogram while preserving diversity and improving downstream transfer.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.