/ Paper arXiv 2611.11344
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Key numbers
From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Spatial reasoning requires understanding how objects and observers are arranged in a scene and how their relations change with viewpoint or movement. Vision-language models (VLMs) typically perform both steps through model-internal reasoning, forming an implicit scene interpretation from partial views and imagining the consequences of spatial transformations. A misread scene can lead to a wrong answer, while even a correct interpretation does not ensure that imagined transformations satisfy spatial constraints. We introduce Spatial Harness, which represents scenes as explicit and executable world states to ground spatial reasoning in physics-engine feedback. A Perceiver integrates scene constraints extracted from the question with specialized visual estimates to place objects and cameras in a shared coordinate frame. The resulting state is instantiated in a physics engine, where a Reasoner executes viewpoint changes and uses computed measurements and rendered views to guide reasoning. We evaluate on MindCube, SAT, MMSI-Bench, and SpatialRGPT-Bench with open- and closed-weight VLMs. On MindCube, Spatial Harness improves Qwen3.5-27B from 52.70% to 71.14%, surpassing pySpatial by 7.52 percentage points. Given identical annotated object and camera poses, it reaches 98.25% versus 71.81% for model-internal reasoning. Code is publicly available at: https://github.com/tmlr-group/Spatial-Harness
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Try it
Code, models and demos that use this paper.
- Code:
- ★ 1 on GitHub ↗
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.