All papersLLMs & Language ModelsUC Riverside

Test-Time Scaling for Diffusion Language Models with Frequency-Aware Remasking

/ Paper arXiv 2611.10486

Key numbers

3.75%frequency-aware remasking recovers solutions for 3.75% to 18.75% of examples
18.75%frequency-aware remasking recovers solutions for 3.75% to 18.75% of examples
11.39and absolute coverage gains of up to 11.39 percentage points

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Why this ranked

MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works

12 / 100#40 of 955 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.

Builder evidence0 / 40

  • No public code found

Community attention9.5 / 30

  • ▲ 8 upvotes on Hugging Face

Author track record2.5 / 15

  • From UC Riverside

What the paper shows0 / 15

  • Nothing found

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Diffusion language models (DLMs) generate text through iterative denoising, where decisions about which tokens to commit or remask strongly affect output quality. Existing certainty-aware strategies rely on instantaneous confidence or entropy, but these local signals can be misleading on difficult reasoning problems. We formulate DLM test-time scaling as adaptive allocation of both inference compute and decoding strategies. Our two-stage approach uses a fast base sampler to solve easy questions, then applies frequency-aware remasking to the remaining hard questions. This strategy tracks how often each token's prediction changes across denoising steps and preferentially commits frequently changing tokens, encouraging samples to explore alternative reasoning paths rather than collapse onto the model's preferred trajectory. Experiments with LLaDA-8B-Instruct and Dream-7B-Instruct show consistent improvements over a strong adaptive allocation baseline, with absolute accuracy gains of up to 3.73 percentage points (LLaDA) and 7.33 percentage points (Dream) on MATH-500, and absolute coverage gains of up to 11.39 percentage points (LLaDA) and 10.98 percentage points (Dream) on HumanEval. On questions unsolved by the base certainty-aware strategy after 100 samples, frequency-aware remasking recovers solutions for 3.75% to 18.75% of examples.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF