/ Paper arXiv 2611.08538
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Key numbers
From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.
Why this ranked
MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works
10 / 100#44 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.
Builder evidence0 / 40
- No public code found
Community attention7.8 / 30
- ▲ 5 upvotes on Hugging Face
Author track record2.5 / 15
- From Johns Hopkins University
What the paper shows0 / 15
- Nothing found
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Subliminal learning is a phenomenon in large language models (LLMs) where a teacher passes a hidden preference to a student through training data unrelated to that preference. We study whether subliminal learning also occurs in vision-language models (VLMs). We finetune a teacher VLM to prefer a specific animal or facial attribute and use a control teacher from the same base model. Both teachers generate numbers for an unrelated visual task involving geometric shapes. Two students initialized from the same base VLM are finetuned on the same images, using numbers generated by either the biased or control teacher. Across VLMs ranging from 2B to 7B parameters, we find that both animal and facial preferences can transfer through this unrelated task. Students trained on biased-teacher outputs select the target more often than control students, with a difference of up to sim10 percentage points in the animal preference task. Transfer can become stronger with more training data and varies with the target preference, model, and how the numbers are generated. Beyond preferences, we show that the biased student's explanations use more of the same words and phrases as the biased teacher's explanations than those of the control student, even when all three models select the same image. These results matter for training VLMs and show that training on unrelated data may change both a VLM's image preferences and how it explains its choices, and that transfer can become stronger with more training samples.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Where it fits
The most cited papers it builds on, and the papers that build on it.
/ Builds on 3 most cited
- 201527.8k citedDistilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network ↗
- 200423k citedROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries
- 202312k citedVisual Instruction Tuning ↗
/ Built on by None yet
No papers cite it yet. We check again every week.
From Semantic Scholar, updated weekly.
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.