All papersAI Safety & Privacy

IDSISA: Influence-Distilled Sharded Training for Efficient Machine Unlearning

/ Paper arXiv 2611.06519

Key numbers

50%up to 50% better utility retention in relative terms
6.4%and unlearning-time changes ranging from -6.7% to +6.4% depending on architecture

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Machine unlearning removes the influence of specific training examples to comply with privacy regulations. Full retraining gives strong guarantees but is computationally prohibitive at scale; approximate methods are efficient but lack formal guarantees. SISA (Sharded, Isolated, Sliced, and Aggregated training) achieves certified deletion through data sharding and independent retraining, but random partitioning scatters forget requests across most shards, and isolated retraining degrades utility. We introduce IDSISA (Influence-Distilled SISA), which uses influence functions to concentrate forget-prone samples into few shards and distillation from unaffected shards to recover utility lost to isolation. The deletion guarantee inherited from SISA's retraining step remains exact and requires no probabilistic qualification; the distillation-based utility recovery is a separately quantified, empirically bounded approximation (ε_cert ≤ 0.015 in expectation). We further formalize certification under sequences of repeated deletion requests, where cross-shard distillation can create dependencies between shards; we prove that a closure-based cascading retraining procedure restores the deletion guarantee to the full aggregated model under any deletion sequence. Experiments on ResNet-18/CIFAR-10, ResNet-18/CIFAR-100, BiLSTM/IMDB, TCN/IMDB, and a fully connected network on Fashion-MNIST show 14-91% better selective forgetting, up to 50% better utility retention in relative terms (with consistent percentage-point gains on the other architectures, where a relative baseline is undefined), and unlearning-time changes ranging from -6.7% to +6.4% depending on architecture, relative to SISA.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF