All papersReasoning & AgentsThe University of Melbourne

EvoGuard: Mitigating Degradation in Online Skill Evolution

/ Paper arXiv 2611.06444

Key numbers

11.0%EvoGuard improves success by 11.0% on ALFWorld
5.9%EvoGuard improves success by 11.0% on ALFWorld, 5.9% on ScienceWorld
2.7%5.9% on ScienceWorld, and 2.7% on LiveCodeBench

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Skills let language agents reuse experience across tasks as natural-language documents. Recent work evolves skills from interaction, but existing methods have limitations when skills evolve online. Prior methods update a skill offline from a batch of trajectories collected over many tasks. Some then adopt the new skill without any check, which can degrade the skill over time. Others keep it only if it improves performance on a held-out validation set, which is too slow and costly to run after every update. We introduce EvoGuard, a pairwise skill selector that mitigates skill degradation at low latency and cost. We first run the agent iteratively to build pools of skills and score each skill on a private test set to obtain utility labels. We pair the skills and use rejection sampling to keep only pairs with a clear utility gap. The selector is trained on the logits of two label tokens to pick the better skill. At deployment it decides in a single forward pass, which is significantly faster than evaluation on the private test set. Compared with adopting every new skill, EvoGuard improves success by 11.0% on ALFWorld, 5.9% on ScienceWorld, and 2.7% on LiveCodeBench.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Where it fits

The most cited papers it builds on, and the papers that build on it.

/ Builds on 3 most cited

  1. 202313.2k citedJudging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena ↗
  2. 19524.9k citedRANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS
  3. 20242.6k citedLiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code ↗

/ Built on by None yet

No papers cite it yet. We check again every week.

From Semantic Scholar, updated weekly.

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF