All papersML Theory & OptimizationSouthern University of Science and Technology

Catastrophic Overfitting is Weight Drift the Training Loss Cannot See

/ Paper arXiv 2611.06082

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Fast adversarial training (FAT) makes robust training affordable by replacing the multi-step attack with a single-step one, but it suffers from catastrophic overfitting (CO): partway through training, robustness to multi-step attacks collapses to near zero while the single-step attack used for training keeps being repelled. We show that CO is a quiet escape of the weights. Across the event the network's clean behavior quietly improves, and moving from the weights just before CO to those just after it changes the training objective only marginally while destroying most of the robustness. The training objective is therefore nearly blind to the displacement it causes, so it exerts no force to undo it. The exponential moving average (EMA) of the weights, which FAT protocols already maintain, does not accumulate this drift and stays robust through the entire event. This observation suggests a nearly free fix: when validation robustness drops, reset the weights to their EMA. We build this guard on top of a coupling-based base method designed so that its average stays inside the robust region. The resulting training removes CO in every one of our runs and attains the strongest AutoAttack accuracy among fast methods on all three benchmark datasets, including a clear margin on CIFAR-100, where it also clears the multi-step reference at roughly half its cost. Code is available at https://github.com/fzjcdt/co-weight-drift.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Where it fits

The most cited papers it builds on, and the papers that build on it.

/ Builds on 3 most cited

  1. 2015247.3k citedDeep Residual Learning for Image Recognition ↗
  2. 201532.7k citedRethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision ↗
  3. 201423.8k citedExplaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples ↗

/ Built on by None yet

No papers cite it yet. We check again every week.

From Semantic Scholar, updated weekly.

Try it

Code, models and demos that use this paper.

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF