All papersLLMs & Language ModelsXiaohongshu (Little Red Book)

CARTBench: Rubric-Based Evaluation of Shopping Advice for Complex and Ambiguous Requests with Timelines

/ Paper arXiv 2611.05862

Key numbers

90%3 of 10 models exceed 90% on Core
45%while none exceeds 45% on Excellence
17we curate cases from real commercial shopping needs across 17 retail domains

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Why this ranked

MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works

14 / 100#31 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.

Builder evidence8 / 40

  • Code released

Community attention6 / 30

  • ▲ 3 upvotes on Hugging Face

Author track record0 / 15

  • Nothing found

What the paper shows0 / 15

  • Nothing found

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Large language model (LLM) shopping assistants now recommend products in multi-turn conversations. However, reliable evaluation faces Data scarcity and Difficulty Standardizing Criteria. To address these obstacles, we introduce CARTBench for CART (Complex and Ambiguous Requests with Timelines). For Data scarcity, we curate cases from real commercial shopping needs across 17 retail domains, pairing timestamped dialogue with 1,603 product records. For Difficulty Standardizing Criteria, we develop case-specific rubrics guided by Ideal Response Principles, distilled from excellent replies manually selected from successfully completed orders. These principles also guide Principle-Guided CART Prompting, our structured recommendation strategy. The experimental benchmark contains 1,328 expert-annotated criteria across Core, Excellence, and Safety. To answer the CART question, we evaluate 7 flagship commercial API models, including GPT-6.1-Sol and Claude-Opus-5, and 35B+ parameters open-weight models. In the first full-suite evaluation under the frozen rubrics, 3 of 10 models exceed 90% on Core, while none exceeds 45% on Excellence. Therefore, we identify an understanding-to-execution gap between required behavior and high-quality purchase advice. To examine these limitations, we diagnose shared failures in product evidence and unresolved needs, linked to changing requirements and decisive unknowns. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Da1yuqin/CARTBench.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Try it

Code, models and demos that use this paper.

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF