/ Paper arXiv 2611.04459
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Key numbers
From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
While conversational recommendation systems provide a more natural user interface, they face the challenge of progressively discovering a user's needs before they can recommend an item that satisfies them. To evaluate the ability of AI agents at this elicitation process, we introduce $τ$-Rec-Books, a benchmark that holds each user request fixed while varying only when the user reveals their requirements: all at the start (volunteer), one at the start and the rest when asked (mixed), or some never (hidden). A hidden requirement can be found only by proposing books and inferring it from the user's accept or reject verdicts. We generate 450 tasks over a catalog of 20,000 books from Wikidata, develop a rule-based simulated user to answer the agent, and score recommendations against catalog metadata without an LLM judge. Across four agents and two search interfaces, success rates fall for every agent and interface, on average from 0.975 (volunteer) to 0.756 (mixed) and 0.283 (hidden). Mixed tasks fail mainly because agents do not ask, and when told to ask, every agent reaches at least 0.931. On hidden tasks, most failures come from agents recommending a book they never proposed to the user. When told to propose first, agents only match a simple baseline that proposes popular books, and stay well below one that uses rejection to rule out possible requirements. We release the catalog pipeline, task generator, simulated user, validators, reference agents, and all agent traces at https://github.com/nbharaths/tau-rec/tree/main/data/tracks/books-wikidata-v2.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Try it
Code, models and demos that use this paper.
- Code:
- ★ 7 on GitHub ↗
- Datasets:
- nbharaths/tau-rec ↗2 datasets on Hugging Face
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.