/ Paper arXiv 2611.02503
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with multiple, potentially conflicting human values remains challenging, as existing multi-objective alignment methods often require costly fine-tuning and provide limited insight into the internal mechanisms underlying value-related behaviors. In this work, we investigate multi-value alignment from a mechanistic interpretability perspective by identifying value-sensitive attention heads (value heads) in LLMs. Using a probing-based value localization framework, we discover sparse sets of attention heads associated with diverse dimensions, spanning both human values (e.g., harmlessness, honesty) and stylistic preferences (e.g., coherence, complexity). Analyses across multiple LLM families reveal functional specialization and structured interactions among value heads, including conflicts between certain values. Targeted head ablations further induce substantial, value-specific behavioral changes, providing causal evidence of their functional importance. Building on these findings, we propose an inference-time activation steering strategy that enables controllable alignment with individual values or combinations of values without updating the underlying model parameters, supported by theoretical analysis. Experiments across multiple value alignment benchmarks demonstrate effective single- and multi-value control while largely preserving non-target model performance. Our findings connect mechanistic interpretability with flexible multi-value alignment, offering a foundation for more interpretable and pluralistic LLM behavior. The code is available at https://github.com/sihuo-design/ValueHeads.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Where it fits
The most cited papers it builds on, and the papers that build on it.
/ Builds on 3 most cited
- 2017201.4k citedAttention is All you Need ↗
- 202328.3k citedGPT-4 Technical Report ↗
- 202225.7k citedTraining language models to follow instructions with human feedback ↗
/ Built on by None yet
No papers cite it yet. We check again every week.
From Semantic Scholar, updated weekly.
Try it
Code, models and demos that use this paper.
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.