/ Paper arXiv 2610.41453
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Why this ranked
MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works
6 / 100#135 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.
Builder evidence0 / 40
- No public code found
Community attention6 / 30
- ▲ 3 upvotes on Hugging Face
Author track record0 / 15
- Nothing found
What the paper shows0 / 15
- Nothing found
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Tool timeouts can leave AI agents facing ambiguous tool outcomes and partial execution: an action may have failed, committed or remained in flight while other workflow steps have already completed. We formulate evidence-guided task recovery over approved obligations, provider capabilities and states compatible with public evidence. A shared admissibility check handles key expiry, authorization timing, dependencies and residual effects; a terminal certificate separates actual goal satisfaction from publicly supported safe completion. The known-model implementation combines standard observation-contingent planning with a separately implemented effect-history adjudicator. In a finite study of 37 assignments, planning and three active controls each certify 28 completions; four saved synthetic fee units incur additional computation. A preregistered assignment-held-out comparison then evaluates planning advice against evidence prompting with two local model bundles. Across 58 paired units in 19 previously developed task families, advice certifies 30 completions versus 9, a 36.2-percentage-point difference (exact family sign-flip p=0.0078), using 272 proposals versus 399. All 116 trajectories pass independent replay. Both models exhibit a positive completion difference. The comparison measures the evaluated advice interface under a common shield; search-versus-rule advice requires a separate matched comparison. Unknown and handoff outcomes remain explicit, with guarantees tied to the declared provider capabilities rather than arbitrary third-party exactly-once execution.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Where it fits
The most cited papers it builds on, and the papers that build on it.
/ Builds on 3 most cited
- 202213.9k citedReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models ↗
- 20236.7k citedReflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning ↗
- 19842.7k citedEnd-to-end arguments in system design
/ Built on by None yet
No papers cite it yet. We check again every week.
From Semantic Scholar, updated weekly.
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.
