/ Paper arXiv 2610.40249
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Key numbers
From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Reaction precedents guide retrosynthesis, but how far they can compensate for gaps in task-specific training coverage remains unclear. Using 2.71 million reactions, we restricted training and retrieval coverage by transformation or time, then expanded only the retrieval corpus with model parameters fixed. For transformations excluded from training, mean Top-1 accuracy increased from 13.0% to 58.0% on a historical test set and from 4.9% to 23.1% on a temporally held-out test set. For temporal coverage gaps, retrieval expansion enabled a model trained on records before 2017 to match or exceed a non-retrieval model trained on records before 2025 on both test sets. Without task-specific fine-tuning, precedents improved all 14 representative general-purpose models on both test sets and USPTO-50K; the strongest with precedents surpassed all eight representative specialized models. These findings show that inference-time reaction precedents can extend retrosynthetic prediction beyond task-specific training coverage without parameter updates.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Try it
Code, models and demos that use this paper.
- Models:
- DianShiGroup/DianShi-RetroStepLM-Direct ↗1 model on Hugging Face
- Datasets:
- DianShiGroup/DianShi-RetroPlanSystem-Assets ↗1 dataset on Hugging Face
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.