All papersOther MLZhejiang University

Multi-Agent Relay Thinking

/ Paper arXiv 2610.35219

Key numbers

3.3%+3.3% on MathVista and +3.9% on MMStar
3.9%+3.3% on MathVista and +3.9% on MMStar
6.0×…remains on par with multi-agent strategies while consuming 6.0x less token overhead on HallusionBench and MMStar.

From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.

Abstract

From the paperThe authors' own words.

Existing multi-agent collaboration (MAC) methods have primarily explored a group thinking collaboration topology, where agents independently generate solutions and aggregate their outputs. In this work, we investigate an alternative relay thinking topology, where reasoning ownership is dynamically transferred across agents, allowing subsequent agents to inherit and refine an evolving reasoning trajectory. We introduce Multi-Agent Confidence-guided Relay (MACR), a framework that enables dynamical relay collaboration among agents. The key challenge is determining when reasoning should be relayed and which agent should continue the process. method addresses this challenge through confidence-guided relay triggering and a bidding mechanism that selects the next agent based on its confidence. Experiments on four benchmarks show that method outperforms the strongest single-model strategies in accuracy, e.g., +3.3% on MathVista and +3.9% on MMStar, and remains on par with multi-agent strategies while consuming 6.0x less token overhead on HallusionBench and MMStar. Further analysis demonstrates that relay collaboration enables heterogeneous agents to progressively integrate complementary insights, combining heterogeneous capabilities across reasoning stages. Our source code is available at https://github.com/67L1/MACR.

From the full paper

From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.

Reading the paper on arXiv…

Where it fits

The most cited papers it builds on, and the papers that build on it.

/ Builds on 3 most cited

  1. 202510.2k citedQwen3 Technical Report ↗
  2. 20228.3k citedSelf-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models ↗
  3. 20232.9k citedMMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI ↗

/ Built on by None yet

No papers cite it yet. We check again every week.

From Semantic Scholar, updated weekly.

Try it

Code, models and demos that use this paper.

Ask this paper

/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section

    / Your notes

    Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.

      Read the PDF