/ Paper arXiv 2608.22237
In short
In shortReport a mistake
Key numbers
From the paperCopied from the abstract, not written by AI.
Why this ranked
MeasuredPublic numbers, not AIHow ranking works
24 / 100#11 of 1200 papers that day, from GitHub, Hugging Face, Hacker News and Semantic Scholar, looked up the morning it was ranked.
Builder evidence8 / 40
- Code released
Community attention13.4 / 30
- ▲ 21 upvotes on Hugging Face
Author track record2.5 / 15
- From Institute of Computing Technology
What the paper shows0 / 15
- Nothing found
Abstract
From the paperThe authors' own words.
Web-facing AI agents repeatedly access webpages, documents, repositories, and tool responses, yet reading interfaces often expose entire objects when only sparse evidence is needed. This over-reading increases token and latency costs and can dilute relevant evidence. We present SparseRead, a reusable reading control layer that governs content admission without modifying the agent model. Its Read Intent Protocol tracks evolving needs and source coverage; Adaptive Reader Backends select how evidence is located and exposed; and the Budgeted Read Gate bounds cumulative raw exposure per episode with faithful full-view fallback. A unified Reader interface supports interchangeable evidence acquisition across heterogeneous resources. Across six models, including Claude Opus 5, and five scenarios, SparseRead reduces total tokens by up to 92.9% and wall time by up to 89.0%, preserving or improving task quality in 97% settings. On Web deep-search tasks, it reduces tokens by 31.0--43.0% and task completion time by 23.0--37.0%. Ablations validate the three designs, while integration with three agent frameworks demonstrates portability.
From the full paper
From the paperCopied from the paper itself by our code.
Reading the paper on arXiv…
Ask this paper
/ Ask a questionAnswers come from the full paper and name the section
/ Your notes
Select text in the abstract to highlight it or add a note. They stay in this browser.